Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/27/2019

State v. Jackson

Citations

2019 Ohio 4893

Syllabus

Motion for leave motion for new trial Crim.R. 33 unavoidably delayed new evidence hearing. - Defendant failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he was unavoidably delayed from timely discovering new evidence or that the evidence was unknown at the time of trial. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for leave to file motion for new trial without a hearing.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. McFarland
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-22· cited 26×
State v. Hale
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-26· cited 10×
State v. Miller
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-10· cited 7×
State v. Minifee
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-11· cited 3×
State v. Powell
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-15· cited 1×
State v. Hale
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-05· cited 1×
State v. Jackson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-13

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Cashin
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-28· cited 30×
State v. Hoover-Moore
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-24· cited 26×
State v. Bridges
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-13· cited 18×
State v. Jackson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-26· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.