State v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Court applied a de novo standard of review “because determining whether the State’s experts’ testimonies constituted expert opinions . . . was a question” of law.
• noting that the Court applied a de novo standard of review “because determining whether the State’s experts’ testimonies constituted expert opinions . . . was a question” of law.
• noting that the Court applied a de novo standard of review “because determining whether the State’s experts’ testimonies constituted expert opinions . . . was a question” of law.
• noting that the Court applied a de novo standard of review “because determining whether the State’s experts’ testimonies constituted expert opinions . . . was a question” of law.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Clark v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-12-07