Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/15/2003
State v. Jackson
Citations
- 69 P.3d 722
- 187 Or. App. 679
- 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 620
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that if hearsay declarant is present in court and available to testify, allowing prosecution to introduce hearsay statements without calling declarant to testify would violate defendant's confrontation rights under Oregon Constitution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Armstrong, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-27· cited 21×
- Beach v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-10-06· cited 7×
- State v. HarrisDeschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-20· cited 5×
- State v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-28· cited 5×
- State v. WidermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-02· cited 5×
- City of Eugene v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-07-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.