State v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing non-pleading defendant has right to effective assistance of appellate counsel and “ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is a cognizable Rule 32 claim”
• “[I]t is neither possible nor appropriate for a trial court to divine the terms of a previously unoffered plea agreement in order to determine the merits of a speculative claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in the plea bargaining process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Chairez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-06-17· cited 6×
• State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rayes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-08-15· cited 4×
• State of Arizona v. Rachel Marie Vallejo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-05-31· cited 4×
• Jacob T. Osterkamp v. State of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-02-25
• State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. K. F.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-09-12