State v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court granted motion to exclude witness and appellate court granted certiorari without discussion
• “It is not the responsibility of the state to produce a witness subpoenaed by a defendant for discovery purposes; to order the state to do so, or to dismiss a criminal case for failure of the state to do so, constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Vixamar
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-22· cited 12×
• State v. Cecil
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-11-08· cited 10×
• State v. Gonzalez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-25· cited 8×
• State v. Haynes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-03-06· cited 5×
• State v. Gorrio
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-03· cited 5×
• State v. Filipowich
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-19· cited 3×
• State v. DEVRICK BOYKINS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-11-18
• State v. Thomas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-03
• State v. Aronson
  Florida Circuit Courts· 1991-01-23
• State v. Henry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-08-06

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Roig
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-12-31· cited 38×
• State Ex Rel. Gerstein v. Durant
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-07-26· cited 24×
• State v. Adderly
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-30· cited 19×
• Knight v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-06-13· cited 14×
• Tole Electric of Florida v. Harris
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-08-02· cited 1×