Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/31/2000
State v. Jackson
Citations
- 527 S.E.2d 367
- 338 S.C. 565
- 2000 S.C. App. LEXIS 31
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Absent the manifest intent to create a trust, there could be no trust or trust relationship to breach.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cureton, Huff, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ParrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-04-04· cited 14×
- State v. ParrisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-03-10· cited 9×
- State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-04-05· cited 7×
- Drennan v. Hunnicutt (In Re Hunnicutt)D. South Carolina· 2011-11-08· cited 2×
- State v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-04-17· cited 1×
- Patterson v. WitterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-06-15· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KelseySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 143×
- State v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-03-15· cited 27×
- State v. AttardoSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-01-28· cited 24×
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-02-17· cited 19×
- State v. LE MASTERSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-06-05· cited 5×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-02-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.