State v. Jackman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• retroactive application of ORS 138.222(4)(c) does not violate constitutional ex post facto or separation of powers provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Stubbs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-06-09· cited 24×
• State v. Brewer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-23· cited 14×
• State v. Silverman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-14· cited 8×
• State v. Bowman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-21· cited 6×
• State v. Gee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-09-30· cited 5×
• State v. Gee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-24· cited 4×
• State v. Albrich
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-04· cited 2×
• State v. Watson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-08-05
• State v. Duncan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-09-09
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-10-07
• State v. Carruthers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-04-21

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. Sawyer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1997-02-21· cited 171×
• State v. Webb
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-11-29· cited 99×
• Sawyer v. Oregon ex rel. Huddleston
  Supreme Court· 1997-12-01· cited 78×
• Macartney v. Shipherd
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1911-09-19· cited 48×
• State v. Montgomery
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 23×
• State v. Rudder
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-27· cited 20×
• State v. DuBois
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-18· cited 7×
• State v. Clanton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-25· cited 3×