State v. J. G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “conclusion that appellant is a danger to herself because ... at some unknown point in the future” she might be harmed to be “unduly speculative” and insufficient to “establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that appellant is a danger to herself’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. M. A.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-02· cited 44×
• In re T.S.S.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-04-10· cited 6×
• State v. T. W. (In re T. W.)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-09· cited 2×
• State v. JG
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-12

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-04-10· cited 18×
• State v. Webb
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19· cited 18×
• State v. M. A. B.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-02· cited 16×
• State v. R. H.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-02· cited 15×
• State v. Siebold
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-01-31· cited 12×