Skip to main content
· 9/6/1990

State v. Ivanhoe

Citations

  • 798 P.2d 410
  • 165 Ariz. 272
  • 68 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 38
  • 1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the “defendant and his sole proprietorship are the same entity in fact and law”
  • finding that Arizona’s racketeering act did not include sole proprietorships as enterprises because Arizona chose not to use the word “individual”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGregor, Contreras, Gerber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.