· 9/6/1990
State v. Ivanhoe
Citations
- 798 P.2d 410
- 165 Ariz. 272
- 68 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 38
- 1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 297
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the “defendant and his sole proprietorship are the same entity in fact and law”
- finding that Arizona’s racketeering act did not include sole proprietorships as enterprises because Arizona chose not to use the word “individual”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGregor, Contreras, Gerber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.