Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/17/1978
State v. Israel
Citations
- 577 P.2d 631
- 19 Wash. App. 773
- 1978 Wash. App. LEXIS 2165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- attorney’s waiver of statutory right to examination by two experts in competency hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ringold, James, Andersen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HeddrickWashington Supreme Court· 2009-09-10· cited 90×
- State v. HeddrickWashington Supreme Court· 2009-09-15· cited 79×
- State v. WicklundWashington Supreme Court· 1982-01-14· cited 54×
- State v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-09-29· cited 35×
- State v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-08-06· cited 24×
- State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-05· cited 17×
- State v. SwainCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-09-24· cited 5×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- Daniel Webster Tillery v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonNinth Circuit· 1974-03-22· cited 30×
- State v. EldridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-04-04· cited 29×
- United States v. Larry Eugene CookNinth Circuit· 1969-10-24· cited 24×
- State v. GwaltneyWashington Supreme Court· 1970-04-23· cited 19×
- United States ex rel. Rizzi v. FolletteSecond Circuit· 1966-10-24· cited 14×
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-12-16· cited 12×
- State v. TateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1969-09-10· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.