Skip to main content
· 10/26/2006

State v. Iseley

Citations

  • 944 So. 2d 227
  • 2006 WL 3025649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, in aggravated assault context, that jury’s verdict finding the defendant guilty “as charged” satisfied “clear jury finding” under § 775.087 “when a charging document allege[d] the defendant used a firearm”
  • the application of the mandatory minimum sentence penalty in section 775.087(2)(a) must be predicated upon a “clear jury finding” that the defendant possessed a firearm during the commission of the felony, which can be demonstrated either by (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.