· 10/26/2006
State v. Iseley
Citations
- 944 So. 2d 227
- 2006 WL 3025649
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding, in aggravated assault context, that jury’s verdict finding the defendant guilty “as charged” satisfied “clear jury finding” under § 775.087 “when a charging document allege[d] the defendant used a firearm”
- the application of the mandatory minimum sentence penalty in section 775.087(2)(a) must be predicated upon a “clear jury finding” that the defendant possessed a firearm during the commission of the felony, which can be demonstrated either by (1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.