Skip to main content

State v. Irwin-Debraux

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 4591

Syllabus

Anders appeal. The record reveals no non-frivolous issues for review on appeal following a remand for the purpose of resentencing to address the absence of consecutive-sentencing findings. On remand, the trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences. The trial court held a resentencing hearing and made the requisite findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The trial court incorporated those findings into an amended judgment entry, and the record does not clearly and convincingly fail to support the trial court's findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.