State v. Ingram

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 1998

Syllabus

The trial court erred by failing to specify the total number of days of jail-time credit that appellant had earned as of the date of his sentencing both at the sentencing hearing and in its judgment entries. The trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(b) is clearly and convincingly not supported by the record. Judgments affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.