State v. Ince

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that unconsented delay of 18.5 months was not unreasonable in prosecution of felony subject to three-year statute of limitations
• concluding that a delay of 18.5 months is longer than would ordinarily be expected to bring a defendant to trial on felony charges before it determined whether the delay was reasonable
• explaining that for purposes of in toto comparison under Adams, the “applicable statute of limitations” was three years, where the defendant was charged with a felony subject to three-year limitations period and a misdemeanor subject to two-year limitations period
• 18.5 months of net unconsented delay, 14.5 months of which were attributed to lack of judicial resources

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).