State v. Ige

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that doctor’s statements were not material because they failed to opine as to whether veteran was insane at time of commission of offenses that led to his court-martial and discharge
• newly submitted evidence was not material as to whether claimant was insane at time of offenses leading to court-martial
• substituting veteran’s spouse as the appellant
• substituting veteran's spouse as the appellant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).