State v. Iaukea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although complainant's prior history of sexual promiscuity might have been admissible on the issue of consent, strong evidence in the case of force destroyed the issue of consent sufficiently to render this evidence of the complainant's sexual history irrelevant
• court noted strong evidence of force destroys issue of consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holloway v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-08-08· cited 20×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-06· cited 13×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McLean v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-09-02· cited 46×
• State v. Geer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-03-26· cited 40×
• State v. Settle
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-01-17· cited 38×
• State v. Cunningham
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 19×
• State v. Howard
  Utah Supreme Court· 1975-12-24· cited 17×
• State v. Zaccardi
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-05-17· cited 6×