State v. Iakobets

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that without findings of fact or a Rule 1925(a) opinion, “we are unable to determine what facts and legal bases [the suppression court] used to determine that suppression was warranted”
• remanding for a new suppression hearing when the suppression court did not make findings of fact on the record or file a Pa. R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion and the presiding judge later retired
• discussing obligation of suppression court to issue contemporary findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).