State v. Hyland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Hyland’s “general, conclusory allegation that discriminatory enforcement occurred” was “frivolous”
• stating that courts should not interfere with legislative discretion if reasonableness of ordinance is debatable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hard Times Cafe, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-04-24· cited 18×
• Northern States Power Co. v. City of Oakdale
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-02-02· cited 11×
• Holt v. City of Sauk Rapids
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-02-25· cited 10×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-01-30· cited 8×
• Thul v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2003-03-11· cited 6×
• State v. Stallman
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-07-26· cited 6×
• State v. Fellegy
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-07-11· cited 6×
• Gerding v. Commissioner of Public Safety
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-06-12· cited 3×
• State v. Reinke
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-08-23