State v. Huynh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 490, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000
• “The Sixth Amendment provides not only the right to a unanimous jury but also the right to Cite as 317 Or App 647 (2022) 649 unanimous jury findings on sentence-enhancement facts.”
• unanimous jury verdicts on sentence-enhancement facts is harmless under Flores Ramos

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Enloe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-29· cited 4×
• State v. Moscote-Saavedra
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-07-13· cited 3×
• State v. Shelby
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-16· cited 2×
• State v. Patino-Ochoa
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-15· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• State v. Flores Ramos
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-12-24· cited 218×
• State v. Ulery
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-06-04· cited 143×