State v. Hutton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Only unreasonable searches and seizures are proscribed by the commands of the [Fourth] [A]mendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 185×
• Tinnin v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-02-05· cited 73×
• State v. Buccini
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-04-18· cited 40×
• State v. Swanson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-14· cited 36×
• State v. Torrez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-12-26· cited 23×
• Frimmel v. Hon. sanders/state
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-11-25· cited 21×
• State v. Camargo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-07-15· cited 19×
• State v. Kappes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-05-27· cited 8×
• State v. Gillin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-11-03· cited 6×
• State v. Magness
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-04-05· cited 6×
• State v. Broom
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-15· cited 5×
• State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-07-20· cited 4×
• State v. Serna
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-07-30· cited 1×
• State v. Rascon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-01-14

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• Sibron v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
• Johnson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
• Ker v. California
  Supreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
• State v. Hutton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-03-13· cited 3×