State v. Hurst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prosecutor's error in closing argument did not require reversal because evidence against defendant was overwhelming

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Barton
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1996-11-19· cited 66×
• State v. Johnson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-11-16· cited 37×
• State v. McGee
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2009-03-24· cited 23×
• Jing Li Chen v. Xiao Chuan Li
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-03-02· cited 20×
• State Ex Rel. Callahan v. Collins
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-10-06· cited 18×
• Chandler v. Hemeyer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-07-17· cited 11×
• Dudley v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-07-25· cited 11×
• Moore v. Missouri Dental Board
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-03-09· cited 9×
• State v. Russ
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-05-20· cited 6×
• State v. Booker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-03-04· cited 6×
• Hurst v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-11-08· cited 2×
• State v. Rath
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-04-30· cited 1×
• State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Leroy M. Holloway, Appellant.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2025-07-15

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Burgess
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1990-12-18· cited 49×
• State v. Cullen
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1982-12-14· cited 26×
• State v. Long
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-04-18· cited 18×
• State v. Pennick
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1963-02-11· cited 17×
• State v. Weber
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-07-23· cited 16×
• State v. Caudill
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-05-08· cited 11×