Skip to main content

State v. Hurst

Citations

  • 507 N.W.2d 918
  • 1993 S.D. LEXIS 144
  • 1993 WL 461734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence was sufficient to support the deceptive theft charge because the defendants’ “plan was to bury the waste on Vollmer's property and yet they purposely caused MDS to believe that the waste would be incinerated properly”
  • holding that evidence was sufficient to support the deceptive theft charge because the defendants' \plan was to bury the waste on Vollmer's property and yet they purposely caused MDS to believe that the waste would be incinerated properly\
  • evidence existed that defendants knew they were not going to burn the waste when they purposely made their victims believe they would
  • evidence existed that defendants knew they were not going to burn the waste when they purposely made their victims believe they would

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sabers, Miller, Wuest, Amundson, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.