State v. Hurley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where the offense sought to be charged is sufficiently set forth in form and substance in the body of the information, of course, it may not be held bad by reason of any defect in the caption.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Nixon
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-12-03· cited 61×
• State v. Nelson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1974-10-14· cited 19×
• Hurley v. Eidson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1953-06-08· cited 15×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1971-11-08· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. DiEMIDIO
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-06-15· cited 7×
• State v. Rude
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1968-11-25· cited 5×
• State v. Daugherty
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1959-02-09· cited 4×
• Bibbs v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-10-12· cited 4×
• State ex rel. Parton v. Eighmy
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2017-07-21· cited 2×
• State v. Danny King
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1998-10-13
• Government of the Virgin Islands v. Smith
  Virgin Islands· 1980-08-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Powell v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
• United States v. Dennis
  Second Circuit· 1950-10-23· cited 395×
• State v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1894-05-08· cited 34×
• State v. Whitaker
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1901-02-12· cited 21×
• State v. Blakely
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1884-10-15· cited 4×