· 6/18/2015
State v. Hunt & Hardy
Citations
- 443 Md. 238
- 116 A.3d 477
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing de novo the legal sufficiency of a petition for writ of actual innocence
- \[T]he standard of review when appellate courts consider the legal sufficiency of a petition for writ of actual innocence is de novo .\
- in this Court’s prior decision in this case, stating that it is the actual innocence petitioner who must convince a hearing judge that evidence concerning Kopera’s fabrications could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.