Skip to main content
· 6/18/2015

State v. Hunt & Hardy

Citations

  • 443 Md. 238
  • 116 A.3d 477

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing de novo the legal sufficiency of a petition for writ of actual innocence
  • \[T]he standard of review when appellate courts consider the legal sufficiency of a petition for writ of actual innocence is de novo .\
  • in this Court’s prior decision in this case, stating that it is the actual innocence petitioner who must convince a hearing judge that evidence concerning Kopera’s fabrications could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.