State v. Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prompt curative instructions by the trial court following a prosecutor’s improper argument prevented prejudice to the defendant
• reasoning that because the witness was indicted as a co-defendant, the defendant should have been aware of the possibility that she would be called as a witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jacumin
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1989-10-09· cited 311×
• Meadows v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1993-02-16· cited 71×
• State v. Meadows
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1987-11-19· cited 9×
• State v. McAloon
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1986-01-22· cited 2×
• State v. William Charles Jones
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-06-30
• State of Tennessee v. James Pennock
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2015-03-19
• State of Tennessee v. Jerome Sanders
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2016-01-27

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Gates
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
• Aguilar v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
• Spinelli v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
• State v. Helton
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1974-03-18· cited 33×
• State v. McCormick
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1979-03-14· cited 17×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1982-05-17· cited 11×
• State v. Hargroves
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1900-02-21· cited 7×
• Cook v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1971-01-05· cited 6×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1971-12-22· cited 4×