State v. Hunt
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3400
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying counsel's request to withdraw where the record indicates appellant was adequately represented by his counsel at all times relevant and that counsel's relationship with the appellant did not warrant removal. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the appellant's request to file an untimely motion to suppress where appellant's request was more than 200 days after his arraignment and offered no explanation for the delay. Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel based upon his counsel's failure to file a timely motion to suppress where such a motion would have been futile and unsuccessful.
Judges: M. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 1,280×
- State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-06· cited 15×
- State v. TyreeOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-12· cited 10×
- State v. LisoOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-18· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.