Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/23/2021

State v. Hunt

Citations

2021 Ohio 1440

Syllabus

There is no statutory or case law requirement that the court inform a convicted felon of his inability to possess firearms. A trial court is not required to go beyond the Crim.R. 11 notification requirements and a plea will not be rendered involuntary based upon such a claim. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judges: Osowik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Boykin v. Alabama
Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
State v. Ballard
Ohio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
State v. Stewart
Ohio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
State v. Veney
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
United States v. Calvin Cassidy
Sixth Circuit· 1990-03-30· cited 167×
State v. Ramey
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-29· cited 9×
State v. Turski
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-06· cited 4×
State v. Henderson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-23· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.