State v. Hunnicut

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the special master erred in setting a “hard and fast” deadline of three weeks
• holding that the special master abused his discretion in admitting irrelevant evidence
• noting that “the fact that case reports can by their nature only present indicia of causation does not deprive them of all evidentiary weight.”
• explaining that case reports are not entirely devoid of evidentiary value
• explaining that case reports are not entirely devoid of evidentiary value
• vacating a special master’s denial of compensation in part because of his failure to accord sufficient weight to case reports cited by the petitioners

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).