State v. Humphries
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 1116
Syllabus
Manifest weight cross-examination credibility bench trial. We found that the conviction in this case for robbery was not against the manifest weight of the evidence because we determined the witness was reliable. The trial court also did not err in limiting portions of the defendant's cross-examination because the court was an experienced trial judge who did not limit meaningful questioning.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 1,786×
- State v. LangOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-31· cited 509×
- State v. WhitsettOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-06· cited 110×
- United States v. Lamont B. Nelson and Delano C. NelsonSeventh Circuit· 1994-10-27· cited 84×
- State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-31· cited 34×
- State v. StricklandOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-08-06· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.