Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/9/1996
State v. Humphries
Citations
- 479 S.E.2d 52
- 325 S.C. 28
- 1996 S.C. LEXIS 217
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statutory language including as an aggravating circumstance any murder carried out “ ‘while in the commission of . . . robbery while armed with a deadly weapon’ ” includes attempted armed robbery
- notice of victim impact evidence not required under statute and no due process violation
- victim impact evidence is not evidence in aggravation and, therefore, the State is not required to notify a defendant pursuant to Section 16-3-20(B) it intends to present victim impact evidence
- murder of convenience store operator in the commission of attempted armed robbery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Finney, Moore, Waller, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-02-28· cited 98×
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-04· cited 72×
- Brockman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-03-04· cited 71×
- Humphries v. OzmintFourth Circuit· 2005-02-04· cited 64×
- State v. ByramSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-04-28· cited 57×
- State v. LocklairSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-26· cited 49×
- Humphries v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-08-26· cited 40×
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-11-01· cited 31×
- State v. ArdSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-09-14· cited 27×
- State v. ShaferSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-08· cited 22×
- State v. VazquezSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-04-25· cited 17×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-11-06· cited 16×
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-07-14· cited 15×
- State v. SappSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-10-24· cited 14×
- State v. TenchSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-04-07· cited 13×
- Humphries v. OzmintFourth Circuit· 2004-05-03· cited 13×
- State v. IveySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-15· cited 9×
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-24· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. HoverstadtSouthampton County Circuit Court· 2000-09-15
- Commonwealth v. VickSouthampton County Circuit Court· 2001-01-29
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. RamirezIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-11-10· cited 142×
- People v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 112×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-02-16· cited 84×
- James P. Free, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Respondents-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesSeventh Circuit· 1994-03-31· cited 82×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-01-07· cited 68×
- Amadeo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1979-05-02· cited 68×
- State v. DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-09-08· cited 61×
- State v. ChildsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-11-13· cited 54×
- State v. SoutherlandSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-08-15· cited 43×
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-06-19· cited 36×
- Fendler v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1982-04-19· cited 35×
- Willcutt v. BrownSupreme Court· 1995-02-21· cited 32×
- State v. LongworthSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-10-25· cited 31×
- Raphlah v. Texas Board of Higher EducationSupreme Court· 1995-02-21· cited 25×
- State v. VictorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-11· cited 17×
- State v. RiddleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-02-02· cited 17×
- State v. MaxwellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-01-18· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.