Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/14/2003
State v. Humphries
Citations
- 579 S.E.2d 613
- 354 S.C. 87
- 2003 S.C. LEXIS 77
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a trial court did not abuse its discretion by failing to require disclosure of an informant's name
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SweatCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-12-06· cited 48×
- Hyman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-03-14· cited 16×
- State v. PradubsriCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-07-19· cited 8×
- State v. DillSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-06-20· cited 6×
- Hines v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-12-01
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-17· cited 485×
- State v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-08-16· cited 28×
- State v. DiamondSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-02-14· cited 11×
- State v. BurneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-23· cited 9×
- State v. ShupperSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-08-05· cited 8×
- State v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 4×
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-06-17· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.