Oregon Supreme Court· 5/19/1908
State v. Hume
Citations
- 52 Or. 1
- 95 P. 808
- 1908 Ore. LEXIS 86
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the principle that wildlife, “animals ferae naturae,” is property of the state held in trust for all its citizens
- noting that, “as an incident of the assumed ownership, the legislative assembly may enact such laws as tend to protect the species from injury by human means and from extinction by exhaustive methods of capture”
- noting that, “as an incident of the assumed ownership, the legislative assem- bly may enact such laws as tend to protect the species from injury by human means and from extinction by exhaustive methods of capture”
- “[A]s an incident of the assumed ownership, the legislative assembly may enact such laws as tend to protect the species from injury by human means and from extinction by exhaustive methods of capture[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court· 1950-06-30· cited 73×
- State v. DickersonOregon Supreme Court· 2015-03-12· cited 49×
- State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court· 1919-10-21· cited 38×
- Cawsey v. BrickeyWashington Supreme Court· 1914-12-17· cited 37×
- State v. TiceWashington Supreme Court· 1912-07-29· cited 29×
- Portland Fish Co. v. BensonOregon Supreme Court· 1910-04-12· cited 27×
- State v. CatholicOregon Supreme Court· 1915-03-23· cited 21×
- Alsos v. KendallOregon Supreme Court· 1924-06-17· cited 20×
- State v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-29· cited 12×
- Chernaik v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-09· cited 3×
- State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-18· cited 3×
- Justice v. VercherCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-08-31
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1896-03-02· cited 399×
- Ex parte MaierCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-08-01· cited 113×
- State v. RodmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1894-07-25· cited 69×
- Magner v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1881-02-03· cited 67×
- People v. Truckee Lumber Co.California Supreme Court· 1897-04-03· cited 64×
- Ellis v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court· 1901-01-28· cited 37×
- State v. SchumanOregon Supreme Court· 1899-10-23· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.