Court of Appeals of Arizona· 7/6/1971
State v. Hull
Citations
- 486 P.2d 814
- 15 Ariz. App. 134
- 1971 Ariz. App. LEXIS 699
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- both knowledge and possession may be shown by circumstantial evidence
- knowing possession of marijuana established by circumstantial evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobson, Eubank, Haire
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Bobby StatenD.C. Circuit· 1978-05-09· cited 187×
- State v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-01-15· cited 14×
- State of Arizona v. Ronald VassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-09-24· cited 14×
- State v. GainesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-07-08· cited 6×
- State v. GerryCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-10-06· cited 3×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Carroll v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1962-02-07· cited 54×
- State v. EisensteinArizona Supreme Court· 1951-09-24· cited 53×
- State v. HuntArizona Supreme Court· 1962-04-11· cited 40×
- State v. MaxwellArizona Supreme Court· 1964-04-16· cited 27×
- State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-10-17· cited 23×
- State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court· 1965-11-03· cited 16×
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-03-12· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.