State v. Hull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[rjestitution is not a form of civil recovery” and rejecting criminal defendant’s claim that restitution was improper in connection with his theft convictions because victim-bank had obtained a civil judgment against him for its losses
• “[a] person may not be ordered to pay restitution for a crime for which he neither was convicted nor admitted committing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Teggatz v. Ringleb
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2000-04-26· cited 20×
• State v. Sigman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-06-19· cited 15×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-12-13· cited 6×
• State v. Voetberg
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-25· cited 6×
• State v. Manwiller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-12-12· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dillon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-12-09· cited 98×
• State v. Ivie
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-02-20· cited 8×
• State v. Zimmerman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-11-14· cited 7×
• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-11-24· cited 6×