Washington Supreme Court· 4/14/2005

State v. Hughes

Citations

154 Wash. 2d 118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an error under Blakely, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, was structural and could never be harmless
holding that an error under Blakely, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, was structural and could never be harmless
holding that to create a means for the jury, on remand, to decide aggravating sentencing factors \out of whole cloth would be to usurp the power of the legislature\
holding that a procedure to impanel juries to find aggravating factors would usurp the power of the legislature
stating that, when “determining] the amount of restitution, the trial court can either rely on a defendant’s acknowledgment or it can determine the amount by a preponderance of evidence”
observing Blakely’s exception that permits judges to find existence of prior convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Bridge, Chambers, Fairhurst, Ireland, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Sanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

152 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.