Nebraska Supreme Court· 4/16/1971
State v. Huggins
Citations
- 185 N.W.2d 849
- 186 Neb. 704
- 1971 Neb. LEXIS 777
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affidavit may be based on hearsay and need not reflect direct observations of affiant so long as magistrate is informed of some of underlying circumstances supporting affiant's conclusions
- affidavit may be based on hearsay and need not reflect direct observations of affiant so long as magistrate is informed of some of underlying circum- stances supporting affiant’s conclusions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: White, Carter, Boslaugh, Smith, McCown, Newton, Spencer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. StickelmanNebraska Supreme Court· 1980-12-05· cited 49×
- State v. FloresNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-02-11· cited 23×
- State v. PayneNebraska Supreme Court· 1978-11-08· cited 18×
- State v. JohnsonNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-04-21· cited 13×
- State v. HolguinNebraska Court of Appeals· 2006-01-17· cited 7×
- State v. KrajicekNebraska Court of Appeals· 2018-03-13· cited 2×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.