State v. Huffstutler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is true that the trial court instructed the jury to disregard the prejudicial statement, but we do not think that that admonition was sufficient to repair the damage.”
• “The fact that the prejudicial information was volunteered by the witness does not render it less harmful to [the] defendant. The prejudicial testimony came from the state’s witness, a public official, and the prosecution is entirely responsible for its presence in the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).