State v. Hufford
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2667
Syllabus
Trial court's decision denying appellant's motion to seal the record of his 2007 conviction for one count of fifth-degree felony importuning was reversed and remanded for further proceedings where trial court did not adhere to the requirements of R.C. 2953.32 by holding a hearing on appellant's motion where it was to make certain factual and legal determinations, nor did the trial court provide any explanation for its decision finding appellant was an appropriate candidate to have his record sealed, but was nevertheless statutorily ineligible to do so, so as to allow the appeals court to conduct a meaningful review of the trial court's decision.
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.