Nebraska Supreme Court· 5/20/1983
State v. Huffman
Citations
- 334 N.W.2d 3
- 214 Neb. 429
- 1983 Neb. LEXIS 1121
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating a party is entitled to receive support only in an amount sufficient to maintain the standard of living previously enjoyed without destroying the other party’s right to enjoy a comparable standard of living
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, McCown, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HuffmanNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-04-11· cited 72×
- State v. BurchettNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-12-29· cited 38×
- State v. MinerNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-01-27· cited 34×
- State v. PierceNebraska Supreme Court· 1983-11-04· cited 26×
- State v. HolmanNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-01-24· cited 25×
- State v. JoyNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-07-26· cited 20×
- State v. TainterNebraska Supreme Court· 1984-12-21· cited 19×
- Ripp v. RieslandNebraska Supreme Court· 1966-04-22· cited 11×
- State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court· 2024-08-02· cited 11×
- In Re the Marriage of Paul Fitzgerald and Evonne Fitzgerald Upon the Petition of Paul Fitzgerald, and Concerning Evonne FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-06-10
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 1,005×
- State v. TrueNebraska Supreme Court· 1982-02-26· cited 34×
- State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court· 1982-12-10· cited 8×
- State v. OglesbyNebraska Supreme Court· 1972-03-24· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.