State v. Huffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statute prohibiting the operation of a motor vehicle in such a manner as to likely endanger persons or property is open to conjecture and unconstitutionally vague

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Merithew
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-07-26· cited 38×
• State v. Hamilton
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1983-11-18· cited 26×
• State v. Valencia
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1980-03-11· cited 18×
• State v. Carpenter
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1982-04-03· cited 15×
• State v. Mattan
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-01-09· cited 15×
• State v. Bourke
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-01-25· cited 8×
• State v. Metzger
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1982-05-14· cited 7×
• Miller v. Peterson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1981-05-01· cited 5×
• Opinion No. (1985)
  Nebraska Attorney General Reports· 1985-03-18
• Opinion No. (1981)
  Nebraska Attorney General Reports· 1981-03-04
• Opinion No. (1982)
  Nebraska Attorney General Reports· 1982-03-25
• State v. Khat
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2018-12-31

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Connally v. General Construction Co.
  Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
• State ex rel. English v. Ruback
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1938-10-07· cited 39×
• Heywood v. Brainard
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1967-01-17· cited 25×
• State v. Adams
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1966-07-08· cited 23×
• State v. Nelson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1959-04-10· cited 20×
• State v. Knoles
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1977-08-17· cited 17×
• Application of Markham
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1965-03-26· cited 13×
• State v. Pocras
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1958-05-16· cited 12×