Skip to main content

State v. Hudson

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 866

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in its imposition of consecutive sentences. The consecutive sentencing findings were not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Judgments affirmed.

Judges: Epley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.