State v. Hudson
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 3057
Syllabus
SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE — MANIFEST WEIGHT — IMPORTUNING — R.C. 2907.07: Defendant's conviction for importuning was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the juvenile victim testified that defendant school-security guard texted her to determine what class she was in, showed up outside of her classroom, and when the victim left class to go to the restroom, defendant waited for her and then asked her to engage in sexual activity.
Judges: Nestor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-17· cited 34×
- State v. SextonOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-05· cited 5×
- State v. HarperOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-11· cited 4×
- State v. TrentmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-04· cited 3×
- In re D. ChildrenOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.