State v. Hudkins
Citations
- 184 N.E.3d 160
- 2022 Ohio 249
Syllabus
R.C. 2945.38(C)(2) unambiguously limits the maximum amount of time that a criminal defendant can be ordered to undergo treatment to restore him to competency to a maximum of six months when the defendant is facing a felony offense that is not a first or second-degree offense of violence. The time period for restorative treatment does not begin anew or \restart\ when there is a period of competency in between incompetency findings. As there was not a substantial probability that the defendant could be restored to competency with less than six months of treatment, the trial court should have dismissed the indictment and discharged the defendant or, alternatively, filed an affidavit in probate court for civil commitment pursuant to Chapter 5122. or 5123. of the Revised Code. The decision of the court was reversed and the matter remanded for compliance with R.C. 2945.38(H)(4).
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-09-24· cited 153×
- State v. PariagOhio Supreme Court· 2013-09-19· cited 146×
- State v. KreischerOhio Supreme Court· 2006-06-14· cited 67×
- State ex rel. Natl. Lime & Stone Co. v. Marion Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-10-31· cited 29×
- State v. Jeffries (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-04-22· cited 29×
- State v. Bryant (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-03-24· cited 24×
- State v. BairdOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-30· cited 7×
- State v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.