State v. Huber
Citations
- 27 Del. 259
- 4 Boyce 259
- 88 A. 453
- 1913 Del. LEXIS 40
Syllabus
<p>1. Weights and Measures—Regulation—Sale of Bread—Offenses— Intent.</p> <p>Criminal intent is not an element of the offense created by Act June 1, 1898 (21 Del. Laws, c. 92), prohibiting the sale of bread by the loaf weighing less than one pound avoirdupois.</p> <p>2. Weights and Measures—Sale of Bread—Regulation—Weight— Police Power.</p> <p>Act June 1, 1898 (21 Del. Laws, c. 92), prohibiting the sale of bread by the loaf weighing less than one pound avoirdupois, is a proper exercise of police power, and not unconstitutional for unreasonableness, as abridging the privileges and immunities of citizens, etc.</p> <p>3. Weights and Measures—Bread—Regulation of Sale—“Loaf”. The word “loaf”, as used in Act June 1, 1898 (21 Del. Laws, c. 92), prohibiting the sale of bread by the loaf weighing less than one pound avoirdupois, does not mean a roll, twist, bun, or any form or shape of bread other than that which the term is ordinarily and popularly understood to mean.</p>
Judges: Pennewill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. WagnerMichigan Supreme Court· 1891-07-28· cited 29×
- City of Chicago v. SchmidingerIllinois Supreme Court· 1909-12-22· cited 25×
- City of Buffalo v. Collins Baking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1899-07-01· cited 13×
- State v. FaheyNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1904-12-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.