Skip to main content

State v. Huber

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3012

Syllabus

The defendant's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in replacing a tardy juror with an alternate juror, and the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion for a new trial. Additionally, the defendant did not demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel or that cumulative error deprived him of a fair trial. Accordingly, the trial court's judgment was affirmed.

Judges: Dorrian, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.