State v. Huber
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3012
Syllabus
The defendant's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in replacing a tardy juror with an alternate juror, and the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion for a new trial. Additionally, the defendant did not demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel or that cumulative error deprived him of a fair trial. Accordingly, the trial court's judgment was affirmed.
Judges: Dorrian, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1956-01-23· cited 2,788×
- State v. DeMarcoOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 679×
- State v. WoleryOhio Supreme Court· 1976-06-02· cited 520×
- State v. ColemanOhio Supreme Court· 1988-07-06· cited 374×
- State v. HesterOhio Supreme Court· 1976-02-04· cited 344×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 2004-11-17· cited 230×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 1998-02-04· cited 180×
- United States v. Fred Lacoy Smith and Woodrow Wilson Wallace, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1977-04-08· cited 95×
- State v. SamatarOhio Court of Appeals· 2003-03-31· cited 92×
- State v. PilgrimOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-10-08· cited 92×
- United States v. Robert Warren CameronThird Circuit· 1972-07-12· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.