State v. Hsu
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2584
Syllabus
Sufficiency of the evidence promoting prostitution R.C. 2907.22(A) possession of criminal tools circumstantial evidence establishing, maintaining, supervising, or operating a brothel supervising, managing, or controlling the activities of a prostitute manifest weight of the evidence merger allied offenses of similar import R.C. 2941.25 offenses committed separately different animus. Appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. In addition, the trial court did not err in declining to merge the two separate offenses of promoting prostitution for purposes of sentencing because the offenses were not allied offenses of similar import.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court· 2001-01-03· cited 1,260×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 1,198×
- Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc.Supreme Court· 1960-11-07· cited 323×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2000-03-01· cited 225×
- State v. CassanoOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-06· cited 129×
- State v. PetwayOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-27· cited 63×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2000-02-29· cited 62×
- State v. RodanoOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 61×
- State v. HawthorneOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-23· cited 46×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-30· cited 42×
- State v. WacheeOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-05· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.