State v. Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• failure of field sobriety tests, along with refusal to take Breathalyzer test and slurred speech, sufficient to prove intoxication
• evidence that driver appeared impaired, spoke with slurred speech, failed field sobriety tests, and refused to submit to breath test sufficient for jury to find driver violated § 14-227a [a] [1]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Morelli
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-08-18· cited 43×
• Nash v. Stevens
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-07-09· cited 8×
• State v. Fontaine
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-01-20· cited 4×
• State v. Cyr
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-06-12· cited 4×
• State v. Russo
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2023-10-03· cited 4×
• State v. Sadowski
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-11-19· cited 2×
• State v. Mosback
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-08-11

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-15· cited 90×
• State v. Kinchen
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-03· cited 38×
• State v. Haight
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-22· cited 26×
• State v. Gordon
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-17· cited 26×
• State v. Elsey
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-03-02· cited 25×
• State v. LIBORIO A.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-01-24· cited 19×
• State v. Salmon
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-10-09· cited 16×
• State v. Pulaski
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-13· cited 12×
• State v. Kondracki
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-12-22· cited 7×
• State v. Weisenberg
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-09-23· cited 6×
• State v. Jones-Richards
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-09-14· cited 5×