Utah Supreme Court· 6/30/1982
State v. Howell
Citations
- 649 P.2d 91
- 1982 Utah LEXIS 1002
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court in a murder trial properly gave a lesser included offense instruction on manslaughter over the defendant's objection
- holding that one can be convicted of attempted manslaughter under the subsections of section 76-5-205 that require intentional conduct but not under the subsection that only requires the mens rea of recklessness
- explaining that a jury is not “obligated to believe the evidence most favorable to [the] defendant”
- explaining that a jury is not “obligated to believe the evidence most favorable to [the] defendant” and that the “existence of contradictory evidence or of conflicting inferences does not warrant disturbing the jury’s verdict” on appeal
- trial court may properly give lesser included offense instruction, even over a defendant’s objection, if there is clearly no risk he or she will be prejudiced by lack of notice
- evidence sufficient to support convictions for manslaughter and attempted manslaughter
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Hall, Oaks, Howe, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LowUtah Supreme Court· 2008-08-22· cited 165×
- State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court· 1991-10-15· cited 163×
- Commonwealth v. AdjutantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-03-14· cited 78×
- People v. GarciaIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-11-18· cited 70×
- State v. FrameUtah Supreme Court· 1986-07-31· cited 68×
- State v. CaseyUtah Supreme Court· 2003-12-05· cited 64×
- People v. KnaffIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 57×
- State v. CrickUtah Supreme Court· 1983-11-09· cited 49×
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2014-01-09· cited 44×
- State v. CasarezUtah Supreme Court· 1982-12-09· cited 42×
- Andreason v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1993-02-18· cited 41×
- State v. MartinUtah Supreme Court· 2002-03-29· cited 37×
- State v. KellyUtah Supreme Court· 1986-05-01· cited 35×
- State v. VigilUtah Supreme Court· 1992-09-03· cited 33×
- Waits v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-09-29· cited 33×
- State v. SpillersUtah Supreme Court· 2007-01-26· cited 31×
- State v. CantuUtah Supreme Court· 1988-01-12· cited 30×
- Brewer v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadUtah Supreme Court· 2001-08-28· cited 30×
- State v. S.H.Utah Supreme Court· 2002-12-10· cited 28×
- State v. BradleyUtah Supreme Court· 1988-03-15· cited 26×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. James H. BurksD.C. Circuit· 1972-10-19· cited 94×
- The People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court· 1967-01-19· cited 78×
- State v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court· 1981-10-14· cited 45×
- Commonwealth v. BeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-06· cited 40×
- People v. BaerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-01-09· cited 38×
- State v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court· 1955-01-13· cited 34×
- State v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court· 1977-05-25· cited 33×
- State v. PankratzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-03-13· cited 27×
- State v. NormanUtah Supreme Court· 1978-05-24· cited 24×
- State v. GellatlyUtah Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 24×
- Rayner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-02-07· cited 21×
- State v. HowardUtah Supreme Court· 1975-12-24· cited 17×
- State v. FortUtah Supreme Court· 1977-12-22· cited 16×
- Jordan v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1976-03-05· cited 15×
- State v. ElliottUtah Supreme Court· 1982-01-21· cited 12×
- State v. MoraUtah Supreme Court· 1977-01-13· cited 9×
- State v. CoffeyUtah Supreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.