Court of Appeals of Washington· 7/30/1986
State v. Howe
Citations
- 723 P.2d 452
- 44 Wash. App. 559
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing Meacham 's hearing requirement, found that hearing with submission of affidavits and arguments of counsel, which established reasonable possibility or prima facie case of requisite sexual intercourse, sufficient to order blood testing
- paternity statute amended legislatively to require \reasonable possibility\ standard; court determined that hearing with submission of affidavits and arguments of counsel satisfied due process
- substantial evidence of paternity included the mother's testimony regarding the time of sexual intercourse and absence of her menstrual period thereafter
- mother’s affidavit denying father’s paternity established Rule 35 “good cause” to order blood test
- requiring “reasonable possibility or prima facie case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schumacher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Interest of JMSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1991-12-02· cited 31×
- Matter of Marriage of T.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-01-11· cited 28×
- State Ex Rel. Henderson v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-01-12· cited 18×
- State Ex Rel. Taylor v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-04-19· cited 17×
- State ex rel. McMichael v. FoxWashington Supreme Court· 1997-06-05· cited 11×
- Gourley v. GourleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-08-09· cited 11×
- State on Behalf of McMichael v. FoxWashington Supreme Court· 1997-06-05· cited 10×
- In Re GourleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-08-09· cited 10×
- S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-10-06· cited 10×
- Antonsen v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY OF MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-03-12· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Department of Justice v. SpringCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-08-31· cited 5×
- Calcaterra v. ManfraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-10-28· cited 3×
- In Re Parentage of CalcaterraCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-10-28· cited 2×
- State v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-12-11· cited 1×
- Sa v. MaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-10-06
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 1,194×
- In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court· 1973-08-30· cited 470×
- State v. MeachamWashington Supreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 86×
- State v. WoodWashington Supreme Court· 1977-09-29· cited 74×
- Minnich v. RiveraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-21· cited 28×
- Keener v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1977-06-24· cited 21×
- Rose v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court· 1981-05-28· cited 18×
- Balfour v. BalfourCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1982-04-21· cited 15×
- Gregory v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court· 1983-05-20· cited 12×
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-09-10· cited 12×
- State Ex Rel. Toryak v. SpagnuoloWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 10×
- Alicia C. v. Evaristo G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-04-04· cited 9×
- STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-10-31· cited 8×
- G. L. v. S. D.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1979-09-04· cited 7×
- Shaw v. SewardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1985-05-03· cited 6×
- Walsh v. PalmaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-04-09· cited 4×
- Alicia C. ex rel. Zulema C. v. Evaristo G.NYC Family Court· 1982-09-01· cited 4×
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Louis T.NYC Family Court· 1984-12-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.