State v. Howard
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 2001
Syllabus
Appellant did not provide an affidavit or any other supporting evidentiary documents in his petition for post-conviction relief that contained operative facts to establish a substantive ground for relief. His self-serving statements and broad conclusory allegations were legally insufficient to rebut the record on review or to require a hearing on the petition in the trial court. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
- State v. KapperOhio Supreme Court· 1983-05-18· cited 335×
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court· 2008-04-09· cited 92×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-17· cited 17×
- State v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-24· cited 7×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-13· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.